Retail & supplier catalogs

Fragmented catalogs.
Shared definitions.

Explore product data normalization built around your category structure, source records, and review team.

Product records arrive in different dialects.

A supplier description, local product title, and internal spreadsheet may describe similar items with different names, units, and category labels. A shared taxonomy provides a structure for comparing those records.

A focused normalization workflow.

  1. Define the scopeChoose product families, markets, field requirements, and the source systems involved.
  2. Map into the agreed taxonomyPropose a category, subcategory, product, and variant while retaining the original description.
  3. Review exceptionsIdentify ambiguity, missing information, and cases where similar wording hides different products.
  4. Evaluate the referenceMeasure completeness and reviewer agreement before expanding to other categories.

Start as a scoped pilot.

Retail and supplier-catalog use cases extend the same core classification workflow. Field models, integrations, and acceptance criteria need to be evaluated for the specific business.

Classification is one part of product information.

Cohentrix is presented here as a classification and review workflow. This does not imply a complete PIM replacement, storefront search engine, automatic supplier onboarding system, or full attribute-enrichment suite.

Start with a focused evaluation

Your data has a story.
Give it a shared language.

Start with the records that are hardest to compare. Define the taxonomy, review process, and success criteria for a focused pilot.

Start with your
data challenge.

Prepare a focused pilot brief. This form creates a local download only. Nothing is emailed, submitted, or stored on a server.

No file upload or sensitive data required. Your inputs stay in this browser tab.